Taking into consideration
that the author of this reading may be a firm believer in the evolutionary
theory of creation as opposed the religious theory, I kept an open mind about
the reading. However convincing his science may be to him, it seems there is a
lot of assumption in this work. To me science shares a lot with the idea of
faith, the substance of things hopeful, and evidence of things unseen. Air,
something we know is there, but until magnified we can't see it. And even then
we can't be completely sure of what we are looking at. In the case of words,
his argument was correct in saying that words invoke responses automatically.
However I feel that he was playing on a much simpler mind. The world is filled
with stuff to purposely distract us from what is going on or what’s really
true. When I think of terrorism, I don’t think of Islamic or Muslim people. I
think of the act of imposing terror on anyone. Maybe that’s because of the
military training I received in the navy, or maybe it's because I am an African
American. I've seen and am well aware of the injustices suffer by my ancestors
at the hands of America. Why couldn't that happen anywhere at any time? If you
believe that everything can be explained of has an answer, then you’re not very
bright in my opinion. However if you believe that all things don’t have an
answer, then you share something in common with religious people. I agree with
his brainwashed theory. Whether we want to believe it or not we are all brain
washed. The challenge lies in undo what we are lead to believe is true from a
young age. Challenge ideas and formulate your own opinion. This reading seemed
as if it were trying to persuade me. I’ve always been one to challenge
authority of the validity of what someone is telling me. My father always
allowed me to challenge him as long as I had my “stuff together”. This is an
idea I have taken forward and incorporated in my daily life.
No comments:
Post a Comment